<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First post^Wuse of Google App Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lazzurs.net/2009/03/22/first-postwuse-of-google-app-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lazzurs.net/2009/03/22/first-postwuse-of-google-app-engine/</link>
	<description>Me, tech and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross Cooney</title>
		<link>http://blog.lazzurs.net/2009/03/22/first-postwuse-of-google-app-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Cooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lazzurs.net/?p=58#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I agree with your comments on Google App Engine.
The service has some incredible advantages over the AWS model if you run a website. Using App Engine you would simply upload your web files and let the system scale for you as opposed to AWS EC2 customers would need to launch multiple servers and install all sorts of stuff. Obviously, if you need more than simply web hosting then the service is somewhat lacking (no ability to schedule jobs, email delivery is a problem and file access is limited).

It’s a pain in the neck for App Engine to only support python (apparently PHP et al will follow soon) and limiting external URL requests to 4 seconds is a little draconian, lets forget the fact that you have to use the Gmail mail delivery service and that there is no SQL database available. While all of these are rather limiting they are not the real reason why I don’t like App Engine….it’s because of vendor lock in and the lack of any interoperability with other cloud providers. Google is a big company who will probably dominate this market…they can afford to do better in this area, but they seem to choose not to…Is Google evil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comments on Google App Engine.<br />
The service has some incredible advantages over the AWS model if you run a website. Using App Engine you would simply upload your web files and let the system scale for you as opposed to AWS EC2 customers would need to launch multiple servers and install all sorts of stuff. Obviously, if you need more than simply web hosting then the service is somewhat lacking (no ability to schedule jobs, email delivery is a problem and file access is limited).</p>
<p>It’s a pain in the neck for App Engine to only support python (apparently PHP et al will follow soon) and limiting external URL requests to 4 seconds is a little draconian, lets forget the fact that you have to use the Gmail mail delivery service and that there is no SQL database available. While all of these are rather limiting they are not the real reason why I don’t like App Engine….it’s because of vendor lock in and the lack of any interoperability with other cloud providers. Google is a big company who will probably dominate this market…they can afford to do better in this area, but they seem to choose not to…Is Google evil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
